What the civil service headcount data actually shows
The establishment has not grown. Its composition has changed substantially.
The size of the Malaysian civil service is a recurring subject of political argument and a poorly evidenced one.
Establishment data over the past decade shows an aggregate that is broadly flat. Total filled posts have moved within a narrow band.
Composition has not been flat. The share of posts held on contract rather than permanent terms has risen substantially. So has the share located in central agencies rather than line ministries.
The two shifts are related. Central agencies have absorbed functions from ministries, and have staffed the new functions disproportionately through contract appointments.
The implications differ by measure. On cost, contract posts are not uniformly cheaper once allowances are included. On capability, the turnover rate for contract posts is materially higher, and institutional memory is correspondingly thinner.
Debate about whether the service is "too large" largely misses what has actually changed. The service is roughly the same size and a structurally different organisation.
Filed under
